Serena Williams

by Savannah

16299669_637414149764361_2672217629746783481_o
via Tennis Australia

She did it. Despite all the hate directed at her and her sister, despite the ones who prayed she would not be able to win again, despite the lax attitude of her association, Serena Williams  won the women’s title at the 2017 Australian Open.

16406787_637419869763789_3055653817500616542_n

It’s probable that Serena will win one more Slam this year, barring injury, and that we won’t have to hear Margaret Court’s name again. Don’t forget you never heard it until Serena started knocking on the door that would let her pass Steffi Graf. Make no mistake about it. If the current crop of “best” is what women’s tennis has to look forward to no one will surpass whatever records Serena goes on to claim for her own.

16386897_637413839764392_2021816095509262429_n

There were whispers though, the same ones that have dogged Serena and her sister Venus Williams since they began their take over of women’s tennis. Venus would “let” Serena win. Venus will be a good big sister and not stand in her baby sister’s way. Richard no longer travels with his daughters and Oracene Price wasn’t seen in Melbourne this year. They wouldn’t dare say anything about Patrick Mouratoglou or David Witt so the collusion would have to be between the sisters. Yeah. That’s why Venus played as best she could against Serena. Both were tense to open the match but once they settled it was clear who would win.

Congratulations to Richard Williams and Oracene Price, who set their daughters into unchartered territory in a racist and hostile environment and who have lived to see them once again stand atop women’s tennis. You don’t get there because you want to. You get there with hard work and sacrifice and they will be a tough act to follow.

End Notes

I want to apologize for some factual errors in my blog post about the Next Gen an Rising Stars in the ATP and the WTA respectively. I’m not succumbing to or trying to distribute alternate facts. Again, I’m sorry.

© 2017 Savannahs World All Rights Reserved except where indicated. None of the pictures are mine

Next Gen? Rising Stars? They’ve Got Work To Do

by Savannah

c3mdozuwcaamubs

Let’s go way back when. Back to 2008 to be precise when the four people pictured above played in the most prestigious tennis final of all, the Wimbledon Final. Fast forward nine years and who do we find playing in the final of the 2017 Australian Open? You got it! The same four people. The two top ranked players of the ATP are off doing other things. The top WTA player is doing other things too while the WTA #2 and #9 are playing a Grand Slam final both were widely reported to be no where near capable of contending for.

So what happened? Why didn’t any of the up and coming younger players make it near the Final? Yes Milos Raonic ( who is technically too old to be next gen) was in the quarter finals. So did Johanna Konta whom many, for some strange reason, thought would hit Serena off the court. That, my friends, gets to the heart of the matter.

During one of her on court interviews Venus Williams, in response to a question, said “I know how to play tennis”. There is a world of wisdom in those words. The men and women pictured above know how to play tennis. And that means they know more than how to hit the ball hard. They know how to adjust to what is happening across the net. They know how to think their way through a problem, a question being asked by their opponent. They know the hype ends when they step on court. If you watched Konta vs Serena you saw the look of absolute shock on her face when she realized that what she’d been told had nothing to do with what the woman across the net from her was doing. It was the same with Colleen Vandeweghe. She realized that all the smoke that had been blown up her ass about Venus – too old, physically fragile – was just that, smoke. In the end there is the one intangible no one can coach against, and that is will. It was will that won Rafael Nadal his match vs tennis insider favorite Grigor Dimitrov, a man who many have tapped as the next big thing for several years now. In the end he doubted himself, blinked, and the match was over. Vandeweghe and Konta know the feeling Grigor.

I didn’t watch the Roger Federer vs Stan Wawrinka match because the winner of that match, no matter the attempts to make it seem competitive, was a foregone conclusion. The hard court record between the two men is now 13-0 in Federer’s favor. Nothing to see there at all. It was 12-0 coming into the match.

“I know how to play tennis.” Think about those words the next time some pigtailed young woman or fresh faced young man is declared the next big thing. Some young barely out of puberty boy or girl who hits the cover off the ball is poised to become the next Grand Slam winner. Think about that in a few years when the four above have been consigned to the geriatric ward of tennis by tennis experts and somehow, every now and then they display the magic only they can. When some of the new jacks can make the statement Venus made and it rings true, then, and only then, we can talk about “Next Gen” or “Rising Stars”.

© SavannahsWorld 2017 All Rights Reserved except where indicated

The Week That Was: ’17 AO Week 1

by Savannah

I was a bit upset with myself for not writing a post about the first week of the 2017 Australian Open Saturday (or was it Sunday? I get so confused about what day it is this time of the year). After the matches last night and early this morning here on the east coast of the United States I’m glad I didn’t.

Up to last night the big story was the ATP #2 losing early, racist comments by an ESPN commentator re Venus Williams who is gleefully introducing herself to a new generation (what was that you said Duan Yingying?) and a three hour plus WTA match between Svetlana Kuznetsova and Jelena Jankovic (JJ will be working with Guillermo Canas for a bit), and Agnieszka Radwanska  being escorted to the exit by Mirjana Lucic-Baroni. Going into last night’s matches I had two wishes: That Jo-Wilfried Tsonga would beat Dan Evans and that Angelique Kerber would find a way to beat Coco Vandeweghe. One out of two ain’t bad. I had no idea that Mikhail “Mischa” Zverev would decide that last night was the time to remind the tennis world that there are two Zverev brothers on the tour. I should’ve known that when Kerber needed three sets to see off the brainless Carina Witthoef (I’ve seen Witthoef play live and will stand by my judgement of her tennis brain) that Kerber would be vulnerable to the obnoxious Vandeweghe.

I thought that this year would be tough for Kerber. Her game is not the strongest and despite her obvious attempt to be even fitter than she was last year it was always going to be a battle for her to hold onto the number one ranking. She mostly played her way into number one if you remember her 2016 schedule. She got a ton of points winning Australia and the US Open last year but in between those wins she played a lot and lost a lot. All of the PR surrounding her ascent was more the WTA wanting (needing?) someone not Serena Williams as its number one. I mentioned their unseemly haste in kicking Serena to the curb to elevate and promote Kerber. I have nothing against Kerber. She seems like a very nice person. But the WTA betrayed its anti Venus Williams and Serena Williams bias once again by insinuating that Kerber was somehow “saving” women’s tennis. Don’t forget they’ve been trying to give the savior title to Eugenie Bouchard for awhile now.

But enough of that. Kerber was vulnerable as the hunted and she lost badly to Vandeweghe who was, from what I saw of the video, her usual obnoxious self at the end. The USTA is going to try and push her as the heir apparent to the Williams but they’re going to have a hard time doing it. Vandeweghe is known and hated by many, many fans and changing that view of her will be hard. Her attempted intimidation a chair ump the other night was only the latest in a list of horrid things she’s done on court. Garbiñe Muguruza we’re counting on you.

Andy Murray‘s loss is a bit harder to understand. He had a fairly easy draw and Mischa Zverev was supposed to be roadkill not a bump in the road. There is a huge difference between modern tennis and old school serve and volley tennis and to this viewer Murray was not able to force Mischa out of his game plan. I’m calling the older Zverev by his first name to differentiate him from his younger brother Alexander (Sascha) Zverev. Add to that Mischa’s forehand was on fire and you had a recipe for disaster. It was Murray who, when confronted by a man playing like it was 1989 had his brain freeze. His vaunted (by US and British tennis media) Ivan Lendl had nothing to contribute. For most of the tournament he seemed to be asleep in his front row seat. He played when serve and volley was still fairly common and should’ve been able to give his player some guidance as to what to do. You knew Murray was in trouble when ESPN stopped showing him and began showing Murray’s real, full time coach Jamie Delgado.

One of the things I’ve said over my years of doing this blog is that a soft draw does not a champion make. Murray has had a lot of soft draws lately and this one was no different. When you’ve been phoning it in for your early round matches it’s hard to kick it up a notch when facing someone you’ve rarely seen play and who was not considered a threat by you or your team. Sometimes it’s better to have to face the players who are going to give you a hard time early instead of tennis version of the “bum of the week” from the world of boxing.

Both number one’s are out now and it’s interesting seeing the mental gymnastics the so called tennis pundits are putting themselves through. The US spring hard court swing is looming large now. Will it confirm 2017 as the “Year of Living Dangerously” for top players? Will older fan favorites be able to reassert themselves? Will new jacks, sorry, Next Gen players be able to step up? Did Nishikork Kei take a shower during his match last night? Enquiring minds want to know you know.

©SavannahsWorld 2017. All Rights Reserved